Anonymous reveals their take on FBI findings AND what WikiLeaks is about to do!
According to Anonymous, evidence has mounted to a level so high that it can be called “treason.”
In today’s submission, Anonews starts out by defining terrorism. Their definition is taken directly from the FBI:
Definitions of Terrorism in U.S. Code 18 U.S.C. § 2331 defines “international terrorism” and “domestic terrorism” for purposes of Chapter 113B of the U.S. Code, entitled “Terrorism.”
“International terrorism” means activities with the following three characteristics:
Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law; Appear to be intended
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and Occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum.*
The hacktivist group goes on to reference a WikiLeaks email from none other than firstname.lastname@example.org to email@example.com.
The key portion of the message goes like this:
“At the same time we should return to plans to provide the FSA, or some group of moderate forces, with equipment that will allow them to deal with a weakened ISIL, and stepped up operations against the Syrian regime. This entire effort should be done with a low profile, avoiding the massive traditional military operations that are at best temporary solutions. While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region.”
Anonymous asserts that this was Secretary of State Clinton’s move to empower ISIS and destabilize Africa, prior to her own attempt to get elected. They cite a CNN report that revealed as ISIS being armed with American weapons.
It is well chronicled that Secretary of State Clinton’s State Department approved massive arms deals to both Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The money was flowing and the Clintons appeared to be extremely chummy with these two questionable nations.
Anonymous goes on to say:
“Now pay attention because it is far more subtle and not nearly as inflammatory as American audiences would like. Clinton knew that Saudi Arabia and Qatar were arming ISIS while Secretary of State and they still gave weapons to Saudi Arabia and Qatar though we knew them to fit the FBI’s definition of Terrorism.”
In short, Anonymous says that Hillary Clinton is treasonous because she helped to arm Saudi Arabia and Qatar, as Secretary of State, while also arming other factions in the Middle East, mostly Syria. Their accusation is similar to the Iran-Contra Affair of years past.
They imply that Hillary Clinton was playing both sides while herself gaining power, not to mention enriching the Clinton Foundation.
Treason is a tough charge to prove, especially when complex international dealings are involved.
It could be that Assange and WikiLeaks will be able to shed more light on the controversial issue. If so, it could happen as early as Election Day.
Do you believe that the Anonymous claim is enough to constitute treason or do we need more information?
Something tells me that more evidence is about to drop.