There is no “grey area” whatsoever here. Laws were broken. LOCK HER UP!
Under no circumstances is it legal for a Campaign to collude with a SuperPac, on any level, under any circumstances.
Priorities USA is one example, and they happen to be the largest Democrat SuperPac in existence.
Look at what WikiLeaks just dropped today:
— Peter Petrovčič (@ppetrov5) November 8, 2016
Unfortunately, for Hillary, other WikiLeaks examples are out there as well.
A key player in this story is a person named Avie Glazer. Glazer is one of the top donors to a fund called the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF.) Donors can contribute mountains of cash to HVF. Some have called it a slush fund, as large sums of cash are often distributed to the Democrat National Committee and various campaigns.
Take a look at this graphic:
Again, campaigns are not allowed to collude with SuperPacs like Priorities USA.
The following “reminder” email reveals that the writer, named Latham, advised the Campaign Chairman that Hillary Rodham Clinton (HRC) was to meet with Priorities USA SuperPAC (Priorities) along with Avi Glazer, also known as Avram Glazer and the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF.)
A meeting of this nature is illegal. HRC cannot meet with a SuperPAC.
— Makada (@_Makada_) October 21, 2016
The text of the leaked email message is clear and easy to read:
HRC Priorities mtg on Monday is w/Avi Glazer, both Priorities and HVF
And, in true Clinton style, things get worse:
— Deplorable Rāzərbak (@MediaJuggernaut) November 8, 2016
Leaked emails of this nature raise a number of questions: Will our Government continue to ignore clear violations of the law? How will Obama, Comey, the FBI, and the DOJ react to this? Will the news media ignore this revelation?
Will this smoking gun change the Election, or is the system just too “rigged” for justice to be served?