In The News


Things keeps going from bad to worse for the Liberals and the mainstream media…

Craig Murray is a friend of Julian Assange and he also happens to be the former UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan.

This credible, experienced diplomat just dropped a bombshell on Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and their friends in the liberal mainstream media.

Murray has met the WikiLeaks informant and says that they are not Russian and they are not hackers.

The person who has helped wreak so much havoc for Hillary and the Democrats is an INSIDER!

Writing on his website, Murray stated:

 I have watched incredulous as the CIA’s blatant lie has grown and grown as a media story – blatant because the CIA has made no attempt whatsoever to substantiate it. There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption. Yes this rubbish has been the lead today in the Washington Post in the US and the Guardian here, and was the lead item on the BBC main news. I suspect it is leading the American broadcasts also.

A little simple logic demolishes the CIA’s claims. The CIA claim they “know the individuals” involved. Yet under Obama the USA has been absolutely ruthless in its persecution of whistleblowers, and its pursuit of foreign hackers through extradition. We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilise a US election, even though the CIA knows who the individuals are, nobody is going to be arrested or extradited, or (if in Russia) made subject to yet more banking and other restrictions against Russian individuals? Plainly it stinks. The anonymous source claims of “We know who it was, it was the Russians” are beneath contempt.

As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two. And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.

The continued ability of the mainstream media to claim the leaks lost Clinton the election because of “Russia”, while still never acknowledging the truths the leaks reveal, is Kafkaesque.

Some theorize that the DNC leak could have been the late Seth Rich, whose murder still has not been solved.

Keep in mind, Assange offered a reward for information about Rich’s mysterious death:

Assange also made some interesting comments regarding the risks taken by WikiLeaks’ sources:

Another Hillary Clinton, liberal lie, down the tubes!


To Top