Two women who accused Donald Trump of sexual harassment during the presidential campaign were paid big bucks arranged by lawyer Lisa Bloom, the only daughter of liar for hire Gloria Allred. We know this to be true because both women admit they were well compensated for their claims. They claim that Bloom told them she could get them TV appearance money and money from donors and PACs. Bloom took a 33% commission on all TV appearances. A second woman said that Bloom offered her $750,000 to go public with her accusation.Jill Harth got her mortgage paid off for coming forward.
Lisa Bloom, who represented four Trump accusers – two of whom came forward, told the women she could arrange paid media appearances and secure cash from donors in exchange for their public accusations, two of her clients told The Hill.
The California attorney told one woman, who ultimately decided against coming forward, that a donor was willing to shell out as much as $750,000 for the accusation and promised another woman a donor agreed to pay off her mortgage, according to contractual documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill.
In a text exchange with one of the accusers, Bloom indicates that a pro Clinton PAC might also be willing to provide financial support.
A true feminist, Bloom was one of the original lawyers for Harvey Weinstein. She dropped him after she caught hell from other feminists.
I don’t know about you but I have a hard time believing women who negotiate for money in exchange for making an accusation that cannot be proven or disproven. Three quarters of a million dollars is quite an incentive to lie. That’s why in the United States witnesses can be reimbursed for travel and missed work only. The lone exception are expert witnesses such as doctors or technical experts who do not testify to the original crime.
More from The Daily Caller
“Donors reached out to my firm directly to help some of the women I represented,” Bloom said.
She further conceded her firm does take a 33 percent commission when arranging a paid media appearance on behalf of a client.
“Our standard pro bono agreement for legal services provides that if a media entity offers to compensate a client for sharing his or her story we receive a percentage of those fees,” she said. “This rarely happens. But, on occasion, a case generates media interest and sometimes (not always) a client may receive an appearance fee.”
A second unnamed woman who decided not to go public with her accusation haggled with Bloom over how much money she might be able to secure from sympathetic donors, eventually reaching $750,000, according to text conversations between the two women.
At one point in their ongoing text conversation Bloom indicated she had reached out to a pro-Clinton PAC to solicit a donation.
“It’s my understanding that there is some Clinton Super Pack [sic] that could help out if we did move forward,” the woman wrote Bloom in Oct. 2016. “If we help the Clinton campaign they in turn could help or compensate us?”
On November 3rd, 2016 an anonymous source reported that a third accuser, a client of Gloria Allred’s was paid half a million dollars for coming forward with an accusation against President Trump, also without evidence. At the time Allred denied paying Summer Zervos the money but she was never asked if she arranged third party payments. Inquiring minds want to know. I will point out that there has been no evidence produced that shows that Zervos was paid but under the circumstances, it seems more likely than it did at the time.
The Apprentice loser and Trump “fake rape” accuser Summer Zervos was bribed $500,000 by Democrat fundraiser and lawyer Gloria Allred to make her accusations against Donald Trump, a deal that was shopped around to other ex-Apprenticecontestants too, according to anonymous sources familiar with the matter.
GotNews’ source tells us that Zervos’ sexual harassment accusation against Trump is a “completely fabricated hoax.”
Zervos was paid half a million dollars by Gloria Allred, which is being paid out “slowly over time” according to our source.
Something seems fishy about all of this that makes you scratch your head and wonder why. More curious still is why the second woman turned down $750,000 for her “story”. Was she afraid of being exposed as a fraud or is she just independently wealthy?
